My sister Sarah went to a small college where you actually got to know the professors.
Her Eastern European History professor was her favorite, Professor Petrovich. He was Yugoslavian, and he was the official interpreter for President Jimmy Carter whenever Yugoslavian President Tito was in Washington D.C.
Professor Petrovich was also a character, and was almost always late for appointments.
One day he was really late, late for a plane flight. He raced down the freeway at almost ninety miles an hour. A police car began to chase him with sirens wailing, but he kept going. Soon half a dozen police cars joined the chase, and they pulled him over.
He jumped out of the car and yelled at the officers, “I am the interpreter for the President of the United States. I’ve got to catch a plane. If I don’t, it will be a humiliation for President Carter and a dishonor to President Tito. I’ve got to get to the airport now!”
The officers looked at each other, rushed back to their cars, and escorted the professor to the airport with lights flashing and sirens wailing, as though they were escorting the president himself. It was the ride of the professor’s life.
After he told my sister this story, he concluded in his thick accent: “Sawah, the moral of the story is, ‘When you lie, lie B-E-E-E-G!’”
I love that story and I love that moral
Oh, I don’t suggest we tell lies, small or b-e-e-g. The issue wasn’t the size of the lie; it was the failure to examine it. The urgency of the professor’s claim forced the officers to act without examination. No one wanted to embarrass the presidents.
Our lives are completely controlled by what we most deeply believe in our hearts. But sometimes—I’d say many times—we believe lies.
The more we examine a falsehood the less likely we’ll believe it. If someone tells us our shoe is untied, we’ll look down and see the truth. But if that same person yells “Fire” in a crowded theater, the urgency of the moment will cause many to panic.
Because the shout is unexamined.
We all live with unexamined beliefs. One of them is that we think we believe when we don’t. It’s time to examine what we think we believe.
Confusing “Beliefs About” with “Beliefs In”
There are two types of beliefs: beliefs about and beliefs in.
What we believe about is information, cold and infertile facts, motionless and dead. I believe about Mt. Everest, that it is [about] 29,000 feet high; and I believe about air, that it is [about] 21% oxygen. I accept these facts, but they are lifeless and sterile.
What we believe about is like unread books on the dusty bookshelves of our mind. They may be an enviable collection, but they are unopened and unproductive.
What we believe in is our reality; it is an inner force, something fresh and insistent, an active, pregnant pressure. What we believe in births an inner life that propels us.
What we believe in is like movies played on the screen of our hearts, moving us to tears and laughter. What we believe in becomes the script of our lives. It is our reality.
It’s possible to confuse beliefs about with beliefs in. One of the biggest lies we buy is we think we believe in God’s love when we really only believe about it. And it is the difference between living a cold, dusty, barren life, or living a hot, vibrant, fruitful life.
Identifying beliefs about and changing them to beliefs in
When we merely believe about God’s love, circumstances control our lives. A public humiliation, a job dismissal, or hardship will cause inner anxiety, anger, or shame. Because what we believe in is our reputation, paycheck, or security.
When those are taken, we are left with the dusty bookshelf of believed about books.
What can we do? Let’s let the urgency of our anxiety, anger, or shame move us to open that believed about book of God’s love and begin to read it. Let it stir our imagination.
What would our lives look like if God really did love us? What would our lives look like if God really used every circumstance to bring us more life, to fulfill his purpose for us, to plant, water, and nurture real life in our hearts?
Every circumstance would be water, every twist and turn of events would be nurture, every change of fortune would be an adventure; the adventure of our lives.
The reality
By the way, Professor Petrovich really was going to meet the presidents. His claim was audacious; it was urgent; and it was reality. Even more so, God really does love us. His love is audacious; it is urgent; and it is reality.
He loved us enough to step out of the reality of a joy-filled heavenly existence and step into our world of injustice, pathos, and pain. He loved us enough to absorb in himself the world’s injustice, pathos, and pain; so we can live lives of joy beyond belief or imagination.
We are not meant to sit on sofas in dusty libraries of unopened books. We are meant to have the story of God’s love projected on the screens of our hearts, setting our hearts on fire.
Christ didn’t come merely to give us a plane ticket to heaven. He also came to give us a wild, audacious, urgent ride to the airport; sirens are wailing, lights are flashing, and we’re speeding through the adventure of our lives.
Frankly, it’s one heck of a ride.
Sam
- What do you think? What are your beliefs about that can become beliefs in?
John
Stunning! Opened my eyes!
Beliefs of the Heart
Thanks John,
Coming from you, that is meaningful.
Sam
Jim McFarland
Sam,
What a perfect frame to surround each and every prayer (picture) we present to God.
If we would adopt the perspective of what we believe in versus about, how much more would our lives be transformed and reconciled?
Each day is an opportunity to put our beliefs to the test, as well as seek ways to understand our inheritance and the power of God. Eph 1:18-20.
Wonderful insight Sam as well as a challenge!
Tony Adams
This can also be presented as our stated beliefs, which tend to toward the propositional and pedantic, and our actual beliefs, what we believe when things don’t go our way.
Beliefs of the Heart
Tony,
Great way of putting it, Propositional (and pedantic) vs. actual–what we believe when things don’t go our way.
I don’t meant to put down propositional truth; we should start there. We just can’t stop there.
Sam
Alex
I like it Sam!
Buz Mayo
Thx! So well put. This is such an important point and probably the chasm that is ripped through the hearts of most people. John 6:28&29 is an example of this when Jesus tells his questioners (“What shall we do that we may work the works of God?”) that the ‘work of God is to believe in (Greek=’into’) the one whom he has sent. Thanks for putting words to such a pivotal truth.
Beliefs of the Heart
Hi Buz,
Thanks for the reminder of the believe ‘into’ vs. believe ‘in.’ I did a short video blog on that very topic, with a list of verses re-translated: https://beliefsoftheheart.com/2010/04/15/what-does-it-mean-to-believe-in-god/
and, https://beliefsoftheheart.com/about/believe-into/
Sam
Dana A
Love it! Thanks, Sam! This in an invitation to live B-E-E-E-G!
Beliefs of the Heart
Ha! Yes ind-e-e-e-d.
Martha
You’ve reminded me of an experience I had once. I was pretty fearful and depressed most of the time, back then. One day a still, small voice said in my mind, “What would be different if you really believed that God loves you?”
With the question came the grace to answer it. Once I got over the shock of the idea that I didn’t believe (!), I started to ask myself that question whenever I noticed I was afraid or self-pitying. I found I could answer it. Then I found I could choose to behave according to that answer. Then I found I was changing on the inside.
And that’s how I figured out the difference between believing and being able to get the right answers on a theology test.
Beliefs of the Heart
Hi Martha,
You capture it perfectly when you say, “that’s how I figured out the difference between believing and being able to get the right answers on a theology test.”
And the difference is life or death, light or darkness, and really fun ride or drudgery.
kenstewart
Maybe it’s only me–I don’t see anyone else commenting on it–but how did the professor take his proposition as the main moral of the story? If he was telling the truth, he was not lying. I understand it could be applied to lying, and I greatly appreciated the insights you shared. But that moral would be better applied to stories like CATCH ME IF YOU CAN or PATCH ADAMS, or even THE PRINCE AND THE PAUPER.
On the other hand, if it is an invitation to LIVE B-E-E-E-G! (as Dana sees it), I can see that application.
Not meaning to make it a downer, b/c I totally agree that we believe too many lies. So I guess I’m not sure exactly what response I’m asking from you or readers… just stating my own quandry on application here…
At the least, it’s a very thought-provoking story, calling for more in-depth examination of how we really operate!