Four score and eleven years ago—in 1928—George Washington Hill had a problem: he wanted more women to smoke cigarettes. But smoking was scorned as a crutch for “fallen women and prostitutes.” He was president of the American Tobacco Company, and he thought that if he could get women to smoke, it would be “like opening a gold mine right in our front yard.”
Hill hired public relations guru Edward Bernays to help sell his cigarettes. After consulting with a psychoanalyst (Abraham Brill), Bernays decided against merely hawking Hill’s brands of cigarettes. Instead he tackled the cultural taboo that condemned women smoking.
Bernays decided to pay a bunch of women to smoke cigarettes while marching in New York’s 1929 Easter Sunday Parade. He didn’t want the stunt to appear as marketing (even though that is exactly what it was), so he carefully orchestrated the event. His instructions included:
Because it should appear as news [and not publicity], actresses should be definitely out. While they should be goodlooking, they should not be too “model-y.” Three for each church covered should be sufficient.
Of course they are not to smoke simply as they come down the church steps. They are to join in the Easter parade, puffing away.
In a crafty manipulation of the growing women’s rights movement, he spun the event as feminists lighting their “Torches of Freedom.”
When Others Think They Know What’s Best
Bernays believed that society is best managed by cultural elites, people who know better than us how to live. His best-known book on marketing (suitably titled Propaganda) opens with these two paragraphs:
The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
We are governed, our minds molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized.
When I tell Christians I am writing a book on Cultural Creep, they unanimously exclaim, “Yes, I hate the world’s sexual promiscuity.” But that is not the subject of my book. People have always wanted extramarital sex, but for hundreds of years it has been illicit and repugnant.
The question of “worldly influence” is: how were our “minds molded,” and “our tastes formed” so that previously frowned-upon sexual practices became so run-of-the-mill? And who did it?
Creating “Common Sense”
Blaise Pascal, the 17th century scientist and philosopher, said:
It’s not those who write the laws that have the greatest impact on society. It’s those who write the songs.
Legislation doesn’t rule us nearly as much as the manufactured ideas hammered into our hearts by the elites who “manipulate the habits and opinions” of us masses. Song by song, show by show, actor by actor, they drum into our heads a newly created “common sense” set of answers despised a mere fifty years ago.
The modern world’s embrace of uninhibited sex simply releases our flesh to act without restraint. The world brainwashes us into believing that any restraint against our “natural” desires will cause irreparable damage. It is even given a name: repression.
In his later years, Bernays regretted his contribution to the growth of smoking. He tried in vain to free his wife from the nicotine addiction his elitist-self had nurtured.
What Torches of Freedom do we light today that will imprison us in dark addiction tomorrow?
Sam
Amy B Skalicky
You are spot on!! While using individuals to demonstrate, C.S. Lewis’ “The Screwtape Letters” illustrates how the “creep” is subtle but deadly, and I think applies to larger groups, even entire nations, as well. Your article speaks in very real terms regarding a topic that I am passionate about, and I cannot wait to read “Cultural Creep.”
Samuel C. Williamson
Thanks! Yes, I think Screwtape Letters may be one of the best illustrations of the marriage of the world, the flesh, and the Evil one. They do work together, but I think the most insidious is the world.
Thanks,
Larry Amon
Great article. The creep is everywhere. I despise smoking and this is a great example but our culture is steered in so many ways and some so subtle people refuse to even consider it. Looking forward to the book.
Samuel C. Williamson
I’m still shocked at how Bernays could so brazenly try to shape a culture without knowing the long-term ill effects.
Lymo Brown
Good post Sam – Had great witty reply including quote from Edmund Burke – but my internet skills are wanting and I don’t know where it went – – anyway, if we keep following the “progressives” we’ll all “progress” right off a cliff. I think the creep is all but over – blatant, in-your-face perversion is now the norm. So sorry
Samuel C. Williamson
Your assessment doesn’t surprise me. I think the “unholy trinity” (world, flesh, and devil) are most effective when they are in the “creeping” phase. But the end result if a switch from creeping to frenzy. I think we are closing in on the frenzy.
Thomas R
I absolutely agree! We see it everywhere around us. Nearly every advertisement, every sporting event, even in some of the more ‘modern’ church services! I am in my mid fifties and I am appalled at what my elementary age grandchildren are forced to learn in the public school as ‘normal’ or in the name of ‘tolerance’. I anxiously await reading “Cultural Creep”. I am always blessed by what God speaks through you, Sam. Keep listening!
Samuel C. Williamson
Bernays pulled off his publicity stunt 90 years ago. Even then, the media and “pull to be acceptable” changed society’s attitude toward smoking.
Think how much power the media has now. Back then, very few people went to the cinema, none watched TV, and the radios were of poor quality. Not to mention the absence of the internet.
Today, we are bombarded. And yet the people I speak with claim–with absolute sincerity–that they aren’t influenced by the media because they can see past their schemes.
Martha
Historically, Christians have sometimes received needed correctives through cultural shifts. In situ, it can be hard to see the line between our Faith and our churches’ cultures—cultures that can resist correction by claiming God’s on our side. Conversely, particularly at times like this when we’re feeling threatened, it’s not easy to discern the wheat from the chaff in the cultures around us. Much easier to just call it all chaff. All this just to say that creep is real and dangerous, but complicated. I hope your book tackles the complexity, because discernment isn’t always a slam dunk.
Samuel C. Williamson
Well, please pray for me.